Paul Fussel in his book “Abroad: British Literary Traveling Between the Wars” states that “Before tourism there was travel, and before travel there was exploration. I am assuming that travel is now impossible and that tourism is all we have left.” The question is there a difference between travel and tourism? Is tourism a “less authentic” and inferior form of travel?
The connection involving traveling, location, and alternative world fluctuates between basic traveler's interest , a drive for venture together with, what was usual for 19th-century travel-writing, the pursuit of awareness of individuality which is not burdened by the attributes in the traveler’s own society. Travel gets to be a method of comprehending life on earth and of conquering the expectations and generalizations that tend to be a natural part of the traveler’s cultural load. It increases the range of the world’s alternatives by confronting one’s perception of the normal and the outstanding, making it possible for the person to encounter the real world on multiple levels. Distinctions involving the traveler, a dynamic subject experiencing profoundly, versus the tourist, an inactive agent and only an end user of an item, have already been for some time the topic of scholarly discussion.
Tourists, as D. Boorstin tells us, rarely journey to abandon the recognizable at the rear . Therefore, the “packaged tour,” generally headed by a guide with a speech committed to memory, is sure to protect one from the real life of a different culture and / or time whilst offering all the conveniences of home environment. Tourists take a trip to be amused and frequently to be reassured that their native world is, in the end, definitely the best. Nevertheless, “travel,” as Boorstin tells us, that was initially the exact same term as "travail," is an exercise demanding something toilsome or problematic. The traveler happens to be a dynamic person working. When the tourist has grown to be passive, the traveler is undoubtedly proactive.
J. Buzard likewise presented a consideration of travel and leisure, along with travel-writing looking into the apparent difference between the words “traveler” and “tourist,” relating to valuable experience regarded as a genuine, in contrast to journeys undertaken purely for enjoyment and amusement. Using a vast range of resources from literary works, guide books and travel-writing Buzard’s research of early eighteenth- and 19th-century European tourism drops light on an essential facet of the historical past of contemporary culture. Owing to travel guides, such as Baedeker, and, most importantly, to the pursuits of travelers like T. Cook and J. Murray, a significantly wider variety of social classes has the capacity to set about trips, no more restricted to the European mainland. This particular continental travel and leisure, that tends to reign over American and English imagination and which is in a continuous condition of growth since the 19th century, produces a great difference between the real traveler as opposed to the simple tourist.
An additional distinction …