Aoki, K. (1998). “Neocolonialism, Anticommons Property, and Biopiracy in the (Not-so-Brave) New World Order of International Intellectual Property Protection.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 6(1): 59-115.
Content SummaryEvaluation/ Reasons for Use
The author raises many questions of developing and maintaining an intellectual public sphere or commons remains enormously significant, if only for the reason that the extraordinary grab by IPR owners of the developed countries seems to be forthcoming. This grabbing vague traditional perceptive that IPR law is about outstanding a balance among the rights of inventors and authors and the public of clients and users as well as the reality that all IPR owners are also users. Lastly is the enormous and commonly uncompensated flow of cultural and technological resources out of the developing countries into factories laboratories, universities of the developed nations.The article provides adequate information regarding the flow of data related to intellectual property. It offers clear understanding regarding the issues and fundamental questions regarding IPR. The journal offers rich literature concerning the aspect of intellectual property in practice.
Bainbridge, David I. (2010). Intellectual property Longman Pearson, lxi, 932 p. :ISBN: 9781408229286
Content SummaryEvaluation/ Reasons for Use
The journal defines intellectual property as creation of mind: artistic works, literary, inventions, names, images, and symbols that are used in commerce. Intellectual according to the sources is divided into two broads: copy rights and industrial property.
Copy rights comprises of literary works such as novels, poems, and artistic works such as paintings, drawings, sculptures, and architectural designs. Rights linked to copyright range from those of performing artists during their various performances, producers of phonograms and those of broadcasters in their television and radio programs.
Industrial property comprises of patents of trademarks, geographical, and industrial designs.
The author raises questions regarding the up-and-coming globalised vision of IPR protection entrenched in polygonal agreements, which include TRIPS. In particular, there are stern distributive questions regarding the global political economy of intellectual property defense that must be addressed.
The journal best provides relevant information that addresses adequately the theme of intellectual property. The journal gives different perspectives and definitions regarding intellectual property.
Furthermore, the database offers adequate information concerning intellectual property by offering different perspectives of law that attaches different meaning of intellectual property. The journal offers numerous examples and instances on intellectual property.
Berryman, C. A. (1994). “Toward More Universal Protection of Intangible Cultural Property.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law 1: 293-.
Content SummaryEvaluation/ Reasons for Use
The concept of a state as the guardian of its people’s cultural heritage has emerged from the simple involvement of objects and monuments with specific country’s culture to a worldwide structure that legally allows these countries to defend and protect cultural objects from mutilation, theft, and destruction. Extant cultural property conventions identify the position of cultural property as component of the “common heritage of mankind” and place a worldwide responsibility on countries to protect not only their own cultural heritage however all other country’s cultural property. The journal points out that protection of these measures, however, is inadequate in scope by the …